16v Conversion

When 8 Valves are not enough!

The M16 - 16v Conversion
I first saw this conversion done in 1984, two years before the Rover 820 and the M16 was announced. A bit odd you may think, but this was a real odd ball car, which fitted the description of 'development hack' perfectly. Take a 1983 'A' registration 1.6 Maestro HL and cut of the front up to the A pillars. Then build a one off front end with a complete development Rover 820 engine, drive train, suspension, brakes etc. The original Maestro panels were then too short, so Montego front panels were used to provide a degree of disguise. Remember that this was within weeks of the first announcements for the Montego, so the resulting car was a trifle odd. I called it a Monstro, a mix of MONtego and MaeSTRO.

The engine was fitted was an early development unit which later became the production M16. In all main details it was the same basic spec, only differing in detail. One thing was certain this was one fast mother Maestro, especially since the 2 litre 8-valve engine was yet to be announced for the Maestro, although it had just surfaced with the Montego. Interestingly there were a number of other standard bodied 'A' reg. 1.6 HL and HLS Maestros running around complete with development 2 litre engines in various different tunes, but all with injection. These were also quicker than the final production package.

Although not allowed to drive these development cars I was given a demonstration of their performance potential and it was the 16-valve engine that left a very deep impression. The result being that I gave myself notice then that this would be a conversion that I would undertake sometime, but in the meantime I would revert to my mildly tweaked MG 1600 - Doh!!

1986 saw the production M16 appear in the Rover 820, first with multi point injection (Lucas) with 140bhp and followed by a single point injected version (MEMS) with 120bhp. By 1989 there were sufficient cars in circulation for engines to becoming available on the second-hand market at reasonable enough prices to suit my pocket. I sourced a nearly new single point engine followed later by a complete multi point inlet manifold, injectors fuel rail, throttle housing, with all the other bits that are attached to it. This doesn't mimic the production multi point engine as it used different pistons, (with the same 10 to 1 compression though) however the results were effectively the same.

Fitting was delayed due the Ambulance men's strike that involved considerable extra hours to provide some sort of alternative cover. Afterwards I was able to plan the change and since the car was my sole means of transport to work I could only afford to be off the road for a weeks holiday.

The secret of a successful conversion is achieved during the planning stage where much work was done and parts obtained. I had a complete engine built up with inlet and exhaust manifolds, breathers, alternator and starter attached. One item that was not going to be a fitting problem was power steering as the car didn't have it. As most 820's do have it, and most have the power steering at the front under the alternator this presents a clearance problem with the Maestro/Montego front body member that runs under where the radiator sits, if the car has power steering of course!

In my case all I had to do was obtain the correct alternator mountings for the very early 820 models that used a power steering pump that was driven from the rear of the inlet camshaft via a separate and short toothed belt. This set up was dropped within 2 years as many cam belt failures were attributed to the varying loads imposed via the power steering pump. The alternator drive belt and the brackets are very useful for these conversions though as they are off the shelf parts. I also believe that post 1986 Sherpa vans with the 1700 and 2000 O2 series engines still use the same brackets and belts.

The only other thing was to remove the pipe extension, two way union, oil gauge sensor and oil warning light sensor from the back of the engine. The 820 has an oil gauge as well as a warning light and this is how both are sensed. Once removed the original type of EFi oil light warning switch is fitted to the oil pump in the same way as in the original engine.

The M16 engine is very similar to the 8 valve units it replaces since it uses the same block. This means that it bolts to the original EFi gearbox, uses the same clutch, or a Montego Turbo clutch which has a stronger cover (pressure plate), and can retain 3 of the 4 original engine mountings. There are sufficient other differences to make the possibility of just a head swap totally impractical. (Different head stud spacing, different pistons, rods and movement of various sensors for which several threads are not available.

Returning to the engine mountings sees the 4th mount, the one on the right hand side of the engine bay near the servo, needing to be changed due to the extra width of the 16 valve head and the run of the cam belt. The original mounting can be modified along with the water pump casting so that it can be retained, but the work is involved and the easiest alternative is to use the Rover 820 one. This is mounted to a cast iron boss, which protrudes from the centre of the cam belt cover. Onto this bolts an alloy and rubber mounting block which fits into a steel bracket on the cars body, much the same as the original Maestro one. To use the Rover mount requires a fabricated steel bracket be made that bolts to the offside chassis rail through existing mounting holes. Motobuild were the main suppliers for this item.

With the engine mounting modification sorted the job becomes a pure bolt in operation, unless you have power steering. If you do then for engine longevity I very strongly recommend that the later lower front power steering pump be used. This requires that the front lower member be cut into from the point where it meets the offside chassis rail across towards the centre of the car for approx. 12". The depth of the cut (i.e. towards the front of the car) is 2", and for the full depth of the panel. I then add additional metal in a criss-cross pattern inside the open box to help recreate rigidity before fully closing in the cut section.

Removal of the old engine is simple and this is best done with the gearbox attached. With both units out of the car separate them and compare the flywheel starter ring. There are two ring gears with different teeth, but otherwise the flywheels are the same. In fact these different starter rings relate to all 2-litre engines with a change of about 1987. If yours is different to the original then change the flywheels over, that is if you are retaining your original starter and not using one from the Rover engine.

The various different 2 litre gearboxes, whether it be from a Maestro/Montego or a Rover can all interchange, but there are quite wide variations in the internal ratios and overall gearing with different final drive gears. The very nature of the M16 power delivery and extra power achieved means that the gearing provided by the original MG gearbox (coded K6AR or K6AO) is near perfect. If you are using a box from another source then just check out the ratios and final drive.

Also check the clutch release as Rovers often used hydraulic clutch activation, and the later cable clutches used a different cable end. If different then when the gearbox is off the engine undo the 10mm bolt that holds the clutch release fork inside the clutch housing and slide out the wrong release arm and fit the one from the original box. Now the engine and gearboxes can be bolted together, noting that there is no spigot bushing in the end of the crank for the gearbox input shaft to engage into.

The new engine will fit as an almost complete assembly as long as your hoist has the capacity. It certainly eases fitting afterwards. A hint that I always consider useful is those to ensure that when the engine is lowered into place keep the driveshafts in place and do not let them get caught up. They can so easily be dragged into a position where they can't be refitted into the gearbox without first removing them to get them out of the wrong position they have got into.

The engine can now be bolted up exactly as standard for the three mounts and with the new bracket and Rover mount, fitting of this fourth mounting is obvious. At this stage you may note that the 820 sump is 10mm deeper than the Maestro EFi one, to cater for the fact that the exhaust pipe runs under the sump so it has to be narrower in the well to allow passage. The greater depth regains lost capacity, but on significantly lowered cars this can be vulnerable. In such cases swap this sump for the one from any of the 220 or 420 models, which have a modified shaped sump of the same depth as the Maestro one but with small wings for the capacity. The correct oil strainer and pick up pipe has top be used with each of the different sumps.

The fiddle jobs now commence.
The water hoses use an 820 top hose which is cut down in length. It is also cut and trimmed in the middle with a steel pipe inserted to connect the two halves together. This is to remove a kink that forms when the original Maestro radiator top hose union and the M16 thermostat housing are connected together. The hose from the water pump is 820 and this connects to an 820 main steel pipe. This is trimmed at the gearbox end to mate to an 820 bottom hose which I turned round and trimmed the lengths. Other minor pipes and hoses were used to match up the heater and throttle body water heating.

The wiring can be tackled in two stages to ease potential start and initial running problems. The M16 and original injection systems run the same base hardware other than the fuel ECU. The sensors etc are either the same or run the within the same parameters so are retained. The thermostat housing and the knock sensor positions change sides of the engine, so here knock sensor wiring has to be folded up and additional length fitted to the water sensor. At the same time the alternator wires have to be lengthened, with due regard to the position of the hot exhaust manifold. The plug on the M16 throttle potentiometer will be different and has to be changed for the Maestro one. The M16 throttle pot operates in the opposite plane to the Maestro one so they can't be simply swapped.

The final alteration concerns the wiring for the airflow meter. Once the engines fitted it will be quite clear that the M16 inlet manifold is much longer than the old EFi's. This means that the original position for the air cleaner, that also carries the airflow meter, is wrong as it places the airflow meter too close to the throttle. I simply cut the air filter-mounting bracket in half, welding in a 3" steel spacer to push the air filter assembly towards the radiator. This provides the required minimum spacing between the throttle and airflow meter, and also retained the insulated mounting of the airflow meter. (The airflow meter has to be electrically isolated from the rest of the car) On other conversions the original air filter has been mounted from the end of the battery box which provides enough space for the original air hose that fitted between the airflow meter and throttle on the EFi to be reused. Depending on the final position of the airflow meter depends on how much extra length is needed for the wiring, if any.

Now if the simple route is being followed then the original ECU's can be retained, and will work the engine acceptably (just!!). This simplifies fault diagnosis in the event of problems later. Even so I would always fit the M16 ignition ECU since this is a simple plug into the system and presents no problems to change. The Fuel ECU has a different plug and three additional wires to be added to the system so is not quite so simple a change. These wiring changes are shown in Annex 1 at the end of this feature.

The second stage of wiring modification is done once the engine has been proven to work, when the change to the proper M16 fuel ECU is required to gain the full benefits of the conversion. If this is done later then any non-start is far easier to locate.

The original throttle cable will be too short (just) and the best alternative is one from a right hand drive Montego diesel. Some modification at the throttle end will be needed and I always use a small screw on nipple to secure the end of the cable. These can be found on MGB choke cables and push bike fittings.

We now move to the exhaust, which I find the most time consuming and troublesome. The fact is that you have to run the exhaust through a very confined area between the rear cross brace of the front subframe and the body. The exhaust is best at a bore of 2" and has to go up and down for best clearance as well as taking engine movement in it's stride. It can be done but takes time and a hell of a lot of patience. I have fitted 2.5" diameter pipes through here for turbo conversions so there is room for the 2"!

Please also note that the frequencies emitted from an M16 are different to the 8-valve engine and in reality considerably noisier. A sports system with any degree of noise or rasp with the original engine will be very noisy and even nauseating with the M16. The recommendation for a twin box system is one where two like sized boxes are used, not the usual standard and bomb set ups of most sports systems.

The best route may be to have a specialist make up a set of front pipes to negotiate this area. You have the reassurance that once done these are likely to last for at least the life of 5 systems. If you chose to do your own then I find that the best start is to use the original 820 down pipes which when cut and shut do an excellent job. Retain the ball socket in the system as this protects the exhaust against fatigue cracks, and shorten the pipes so that you only have to run one pipe through the tight clearance area mentioned. As a side note I did originally make up what was a very crude and rough down pipe that worked well from the start. Later I spent much time and effort making up a very neat smooth replacement with much longer secondary pipe lengths. This involved having twin pipes through the tight area and the result was absolutely no power change at all!!

In fact I did a very large amount of exhaust testing since it was clear that the M16 (and other Rover 16 valvers) are very sensitive to exhausts. I ended up with a twin box (straight through) system with a 2" bore throughout to achieve 134bhp at the wheels with a standard engine. Fit a system with more resemblance to the 820 one and you lose a whole chunk of power. Go one stage further and fit one of the 2.25" sports systems for the Turbo models and expect to be down by around 18bhp at the wheels at 6000 rpm. The best is a simple and uninteresting 2" bore system with no fancy tailpipes or other additions period!

The last points to connect are the fuel pipes and here it is a matter of remounting the fuel filter as the new engine mounting occupies it's original home. The injection system MUST be run with an injection filter, otherwise you will have major injector problems sooner rather than later. As the original filter is rather large, adopted I'm sure to help cater for the newness of injection to this market sector and the anticipated neglect of change points, smaller ones are available. I use ones that are smaller than a coil and being a similar diameter use a similar bracket. They are fitted to injected Cavaliers and have a 24000-mile/2 year change cycle. The originals were 48000/4 year changes, yet would often go double that with no problems. The only other point is that you will have to extend the fuel lines to the different fuel rail of the M16 manifold, so ensure that hose used is to the correct fuel injection specification.

Alternative Provisions...
If the car has power steering and this is to be retained then some extra plumbing is required. I have mentioned the body modifications needed for clearance of the power steering so here are the rest. The 820 uses a low mounting for the power steering pump, and as such it is fed by a remote reservoir. This should be mounted on the front inner wing near to the radiator expansion tank of the Maestro/Montego. Obtain as many of the pipes and hoses from the donor Rover, because when bought new they are expensive. The one pipe to take care with are the threaded pipes/hoses that go from the pump to the rack. These carry up to 1500psi in pressure so have to be very high quality and secure. Use of a mix of the Rover pipe from the pump mating to the Maestro/Montego one into the rack is a proven reliable route. The return pipes are low pressure and can be held using normal hose clips. For long term reliability retain the 'cooler' pipe that runs back and forth across the underside of the front of the car. This can become rusted and porous and if so replace it with small bore copper central heating pipe, widely available, much cheaper than Rover spares and easy to form.

With the inclusion of power steering the relieved area of the front bodywork includes one of the lower mounting holes for the radiator location pins. The general position of the radiator also comes too close to the power steering pump. In this case create two new lower location holes towards the front of the car, sufficient to clear the power steering pump, yet is possible not too much that will lock the radiator cooling fan against the reinforcing panel that runs below the headlamps. If, as I have found, there is not enough room for both, then mark out the panel and cut a section out, reform it and weld it back up to return some strength. This will provide a recess for the fan motor and clearance for the radiator to power steering pump.

Note that only the bottom holes are moved, as if the top is moved, then the radiator may foul on the bonnet safety hook, as well as making the modifications for fan motor clearance much greater. (Option. The front mounted fans always seize up from constant bombardment with water and rubbish. Replacement with one on the inside of the radiator (Turbo or aftermarket for example) is a positive option.

The vacuum connection from inlet manifold to the servo will be much shorter careful selection and positioning of the pipes from the EFi set up will enable the appropriate bits to be Cut and used. The plastic pipe used moulds onto the unions used so the pipe has to be scored and split from the unions. To remake these connections use a pan of boiling water to heat the parts up, then with suitable protection push the hot and pliable plastic pipe onto the union ends. Once cooled the join is as per the factory. Note the correct way the one way valve fits and ensure that this is correctly fitted, otherwise you have no servo!!

Conclusions...
The conversion from 8 to 16 valves is the ultimate head modification that could be done and this is reflected in the gains that should be achieved. Of the very many conversions I have done or been involved with the standard M16 in a Maestro or Montego should give a minimum of 125bhp at the wheels, which is 30bhp up on the original engine. If the engine is in tip-top order and the exhaust system is working well then this can easily rise to 135bhp at the wheels. A good Rover 820i gives around 115bhp so the exhaust advantages are clear!!

Run the engine on normal unleaded, as this is what they are tuned for. Super unleaded may provide some minor differences but not enough to justify the extra costs. With the correct M16 ECU's not only will the power be at the levels shown, but also the fuel consumption will improve in the order of 10%. Add this to the power gains, the vast improvement in smoothness and the ability to use revs that were very strained with the original engine and it is a wonder that this was never a factory option. The only down side is a slight loss of low speed torque up to about 2500 rpm, a small price to pay in my view.

A last point is that once you experience 16 valve Maestro or Montego power you will never want to return to the original 8-valve engine.

Annex 1

Conversion of Maestro/Montego EFi wiring to 16 Valve 820i Rover
As promised here is the crossover list for conversion of your wiring from 11CU spec ECU to 12 and 14CU series units. It is worth noting that several of the inputs and outputs from the later ECU's do have alternative functions depending on the overall vehicle specification. For example if the cars are fitted with either/or air conditioning and auto transmission, then detail wiring differences will exist, when comparing them to manual main stream versions. Also different model years that carry the same overall specification have been known to have differences, such is the much greater capacity and flexibility of the later ECU's. These differences should not affect the effectiveness of your conversion by following the below cross-reference list.

The following information provides a route for fitting the M16 ECU's to the Maestro/Montego which I used on my own car and which covered over 130,000 miles. Several subsequent conversions have also been completed, following the same route with the same degree of success. For future reference you should keep available the wiring diagrams for both the Montego Efi and the Rover 820i, and by using this list you will be able to see where the cross references have been made.

Start-up Information
The following reference to 11CU series of ECU's refers to the series type of unit fitted as standard to all non catalyst pre 1989 model Maestro and Montego 2 litre injection cars. The reference to 12CU and 14CU series ECU's refers to the series type of unit that was fitted to multi point injection versions of the Rover 820, pre 1991. As a side note the 14CU series was also fitted to later versions of the catalyst equipped 2 litre Montego's, (still Lucas equipped systems) although the parameters in the memory are not at all suitable for the M16.

General Information
Firstly the water temp and fuel temp sensors are on a common circuit with the 11CU whereas the 12/14CU has them separated. The simplest way to separate these functions is to add an extra wire from pin 24 of the 12/14CU to the fuel temp switch. You can run without this switch, as it is just a simple temperature sensitive switch where the contacts close when the fuel temp rises above about 90 degrees. Loss of this function only affects hot restarts and would result in some few seconds of spluttering until colder fuel passes through the fuel rain and injectors.

Secondly the 11CU obtains the engine speed signal via the negative side of the coil. (Through a resistor found next to the main multi plug between engine harness and main harness, between the washer bottle and inner wing) Whereas the 12/14 CU picks up the signal from the crank sensor, via a bridge in the ignition ECU. The original feed wire to the 11CU is pin 13, which should be disconnected. The 12/14CU uses pin 39 and you should add an extra wire from this, to pin 11 of the AB17 (ignition ECU) which is currently empty.

Lastly the 12/14CU has a specific direct earth lead from the ECU to the engine block, which is to eliminate indirect resistance's. Simply run an earth lead from pin 4 of the 12/14CU to a suitable point on the engine. I found it convenient to use one of the unused bosses on the gearbox end of the cylinder head.

11CU to 12/14CU Wiring Cross Reference List
11CU Pin No.				12/14CU Pin No.

1						13
2						29
3						26
4						12
5						14
6						6
7						11
8						38
9						3
10						7
11						24
12						25
13						not used, see text
14						28
15						1
16						16
17						27
18						19
19						15
20						17
21						35
22						20
23						2
24  (may not be connected)			34
25						40


The above wiring applies ONLY to the Lucas engine managed systems. MEMS is a Rover (Motorola) system that uses some identical peripherals, but all control functions are different. The conversion to MEMS is quite possible and has been done in an MG Maestro using an early Rover 220 MEMS system, as well as a number of T16 Turbo converted cars. Of significance is the fact that when MEMS is used on the M16 engine the economy bonus over the Maestro EFi is not achieved.

Roger Parker


This is a conversion by Alan Law, it gives a whole new look to the engine bay!
Alan may have not followed the same route as described by Roger Parker!